Simple logic. Limitless results.
Hope you would enjoy this Blog. In my blog, I put my observations on the recent marketing and advertising campaigns that I'm aware of. However, all comments are hypothetical and should only be treated as learning aids for thought stimulation.
Promise TV ad
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
Promise has been advertising quite heavily recently on TV. What do you think about this TV ad ? I think it's quite catchy. In fact, it provokes my thoughts about the grey areas that we have to face with as marketers. There are no definite balck and white in marketing as our job is to encourage consumption of our marketed products or services. Promise is in money lending business and it's their job to promote borrowing and there is no question about it. In the TV ad : people spend spend spend happily and then become short of money. No problem, Promise is here to help. It is completely relevant to borrowers who ususally run into the same situation like what is spelled out in the ad. The funny thing is that at the end of the ad, it says "you will need to evaluate your ability to pay back before you decide to borrow." Somehow it's a distored logic where people should have thought about whether they could afford to spend before they actually spend in the first place ! Of course if everyone does that, there would be no market for credit cards and loans. Marketing is about Consumerism, right ?
One student asked me why Giordano re-uses its frog logo from ages ago. I said I know don't know. Really ! Giordano is a value-for-money brand. If it prints its logo onto the T-shirts and jeans, be it the frog or anything that says "Giordano", will sales increase ? Probably not. Giordano is a brand you wear but you don't want to admit. It's not a brand like Nike or LV that can uplift your image after all. So if it puts the frog back onto its product, there may be adverse effect on its sales. I haven't visited its store at the time of writing but according to its website, it hasn't added back the frog to its products. I wouldn't do that either. So what is the point of having the frog back in its print and advertising materials ? To remind us of its good old days ?
This is a fresh attempt in the boring FMCG market. It's a range of Mugicha. Ready-to-drink Mugicha may not be the newest product but the way it is marketed is quite new. At the beginning, just by looking at this ad, I thought it was just another consumer promotion. Then I visited its blog and I found out more. The brand name of this Mugicha is "DrinkaZine". The idea : "It Is A Drinkable Magazine! 以雜誌形式包裝,既是一支『解悶的飲料』,又是一本『解渴的雜誌』。" The labels are like magazines where you can drink and read at the same time. It's definitely a creative idea. My only worry is that if the product doesn't sell fast, its labels and hence the magazine contents can't be changed frequently enough to deliver the promise as a magazine. And I guess that's why it has a blog as the core communications channel. Its blog is pretty good as it carries relevant contents, projects an brand attitude and creates a community, all of which young consumers can associate with. I bet this...
Tissue paper, like many other FMCG products, is a saturated market. Brands are competing for market share while there is literal no market growth. Kleenex, Andrex and Scott are the first comers that developed the category. Yet over the years, their shares are eaten up by other cheaper alternative brands. Why ? First the category is generic in the sense that there is minimal product differences among different brands. Second, the more well-known brands did not invest much in marketing communications. Now it's all too late. Will consumers buy more of these three brands because it is a famous international company that produce them ? It gets consumers more confused in a way. What are the differences among the three brands ?
Comments